Discussion on debate between Esquilax and His_Majesty.

[abaris]

1. It's a poorly worded topic. "Evolution" can simply mean change in allele frequency from one generation to the next, which, as Exlax notes with parents, children and siblings, isn't controversial.

2. Exlax gives examples of supposed pieces of evidence, but never defines what constitutes scientific evidence.

3. The tiktaalik thing got blown out of the water by subsequent fossil finds.

No, evolution isn't up for debate among serious scientists. There's also a solid fossil record. Why don't you search the internet before making assertions. Here's a wiki link to human fossils. Can't be arsed to do an in depth search for someone, who's obviously not really interested in looking at the scientific evidence.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_hum...on_fossils

And here's one to what you call the tiktaalik thing. How has it been blown out of the water? Care to provide a link? And even if it was by subsequent fossil finds, what does that prove, other than that science and knowledge evolves?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tiktaalik