All of this is kind of mute if you guys deny evolution dont you think? Without it, whales would not have evolved from its' terrestrial ancestor Pakicetus. Thanks to genetics we now know hippos are cousins to whales, whom both come from the same ancestor that hooved land animals such as horses and cows do.
![[Image: original_361110_k5eOAUUnQgPr6MXD5RV1o9sfn.jpg]](https://images.weserv.nl/?url=s3images.coroflot.com%2Fuser_files%2Findividual_files%2Foriginal_361110_k5eOAUUnQgPr6MXD5RV1o9sfn.jpg)
Quote:The family tree of modern whales and their first cousin, the hippopotamus, showing how the now-extinct anthracotheres are the link between their distant ancestors. (Credit: Jean-Renaud Boisserie/UC Berkeley)
http://www.berkeley.edu/news/media/relea...ppos.shtml
If I were to create self aware beings knowing fully what they would do in their lifetimes, I sure wouldn't create a HELL for the majority of them to live in infinitely! That's not Love, that's sadistic. Therefore a truly loving god does not exist!
Dead wrong. The actions of a finite being measured against an infinite one are infinitesimal and therefore merit infinitesimal punishment.
I say again: No exceptions. Punishment should be equal to the crime, not in excess of it. As soon as the punishment is greater than the crime, the punisher is in the wrong.
![[Image: tumblr_n1j4lmACk61qchtw3o1_500.gif]](https://66.media.tumblr.com/5fb74c6d16622fb3dbb358509c9aec03/tumblr_n1j4lmACk61qchtw3o1_500.gif)
Quote:The sin is against an infinite being (God) unforgiven infinitely, therefore the punishment is infinite.
Dead wrong. The actions of a finite being measured against an infinite one are infinitesimal and therefore merit infinitesimal punishment.
Quote:Some people deserve hell.
I say again: No exceptions. Punishment should be equal to the crime, not in excess of it. As soon as the punishment is greater than the crime, the punisher is in the wrong.
