Discussion on debate between Esquilax and His_Majesty.

[Mudhammam]

I can't understand H_M's inclination to deny obvious conclusions when even many of his co-religionists have embraced the Darwinian principles now abundantly and irrefutably apparent to nearly everyone in virtually all areas of modern scientific inquiry. A more interesting debate and a perspective that could at least be taken seriously is an argument over whether or not environmental change in relation to random genetic variation and a series of selection pressures can sufficiently account for the rise of higher species from so simple a beginning, such as bacteria, without a designed mechanism in which nature is able to reconstruct and specialize certain functions that result in beings with the propensity for knowledge about otherworldly powers, among other intriguing characteristics.

...Sometimes I think I would make a better Christian apologist than actual Christian apologists.