More Questions for Christians

[dyresand]

harry, quite using the bible to prove your point. It is like me referencing a comic book to prove Batman is real. Again, use science to prove your point.

Evolutionary science is an invalid source of proof since it is based upon theory. And since you reject the Bible as a valid, reliable source of evidence, the question of a global flood cannot be resolved between us; it is a secondary issue. The prime issue is the validity of the Bible. If you wish to discuss that matter, I would be happy to participate.

It's also worth noting that my theological position is that I can only present the evidence, not convince you of its truth. That's a matter between God and you.

So your going to say evolution is wrong? ill fix that. there is a extensive fossil record showing that yes evolution is a thing that is happening and is still happening. Whether you like it or not and want the bible to be true but it is not. A global flood like in the mythology of Noah could not have happened. 1. where does all the wood come from 2. naoh isn't a shipwright so how could he know how to build a boat 3. how how does he build a large vessel like that in a weekend 4. for a large boat like that to float it shouldn't it would be ripped apart 5. Every animal and it doesn't attack the crew? 6. were does the food come from 7. animals have to take shits where does that go to. 8. where did the water come from 9. where did the water go 10. none of this is true

The bible is not a valid source of information on mankind but a logical guess back in the early years of mankind we know now for it to be false. its fine for you to believe it but don't go around attacking science. A Theory or Scientific Theory is backed up with evidence supporting evidence and has been tested and verified. Use the scientific method to test god before saying billions and millions of years of evolution to be false.