(November 19, 2014 at 7:17 pm)Heywood Wrote:and corporations are human beings...I got your point of view loud and clear. Totally disagree with you but at least we know who you get your marching orders from(November 19, 2014 at 1:37 pm)polar bear Wrote: two things
1. All boats have NOT risen, maybe in your little bubble on FOX news they have, but the real world works more hours for less on a percentage basis.
2. After this last election, how can we stand by and allow our politicians to be purchased by the highest bidder. Yes republicans won, but the dem's took just as much money as their counter parts. Less money would only be a good thing, however it is done
Money is speech so wanting less of it in a campaign is equivalent to wanting less speech in a campaign. I don't think we want less speech in a campaign. What we want is to equalize the amount of speech. A very progressive consumption tax would do just that coupled with making campaign contributions by corporations and people non tax deductible would begin to do that.
Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: December 20, 2025, 8:17 am
Thread Rating:
|
Publicly financed elections.
|
|
|
|
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|
Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)


