In fact if one compares a concept of God-given morals to evolutionary-developed morals the comparison isn't in favor of the former. Think about it: God-given morals are completely arbitrary and what is even worse that God himself doesn't abide by said morals. Thus they are not backed up with any value other than fear of magical punishment (which isn't that threatening considering how many religious criminals are out there).
On the other hand, evolutionary-acquired morals have outlined origin and purpose. It's clear why society would enforce them. And seeing how humans have been able to advance from basic morals present in animals further for the better of society and individuals is really reassuring, especially as opposed to the Bible's 'decay of everything'.
By the way, the whole concept of constant deterioration of everything (including 'the fall of man') is lame. It's one of the worst things in the Book. As with the eschatological fears It's obviously there to discourage and depress (i.e. break down and make easier to control). While scientific explanation of morals reassures in better and inspires for progress.
On the other hand, evolutionary-acquired morals have outlined origin and purpose. It's clear why society would enforce them. And seeing how humans have been able to advance from basic morals present in animals further for the better of society and individuals is really reassuring, especially as opposed to the Bible's 'decay of everything'.
By the way, the whole concept of constant deterioration of everything (including 'the fall of man') is lame. It's one of the worst things in the Book. As with the eschatological fears It's obviously there to discourage and depress (i.e. break down and make easier to control). While scientific explanation of morals reassures in better and inspires for progress.
