(November 25, 2014 at 1:58 pm)His_Majesty Wrote:(November 24, 2014 at 8:23 pm)Cthulhu Dreaming Wrote: You wouldn't know an ad hominem if it bit you on the ass.
You're stupid, because you compare the existence of a person for whom no contemporary source exists, versus on where a great many contemporary sources do.
You are the one that is stupid, because you are making my point despite being to stupid to realize that to be the case.
You said "verse on where a agreat many contemporary sources do"...so how do yo know that they are contemporary sources...ohhh, wait, right back to believing what you were told, right?
Like I said, made my point for me.
(November 24, 2014 at 8:23 pm)Cthulhu Dreaming Wrote: So, yes, it would appear that you really are that stupid. Which, incidentally, is not an ad hominem - it's an inescapable conclusion one reaches when reading your arguments.
You believe that there are contemporary sources for George Washington's presidency based soley on what you were told. You were not there...you only go by what someone else told you, and you don't even know if that person was there
Stupid.
(November 24, 2014 at 8:23 pm)Cthulhu Dreaming Wrote: As I have better things to do at the moment, I'll leave the arguments to my counterparts here, and resume the regularly scheduled mocking you so richly deserve.
Your counterparts can't handle me either. I began this thread so I can purposely intellectually spank every single person on here that has something to say....and I am doing a damn good job of it
Your argument is nonsense and deserves no further thought from myself or anyone else. I'm through picking up the pieces and cleaning your shit off the board.
(with apologies to the Christians whom the above image does not apply to)