RE: Obama and Ferguson
November 27, 2014 at 5:56 pm
(This post was last modified: November 27, 2014 at 5:57 pm by Lek.)
(November 27, 2014 at 4:00 pm)Esquilax Wrote: It's really terribly interesting, seeing what our two positions are here. I'm sitting here arguing for more transparency, so that the evidence can be seen and evaluated. In response, you tell me I have no right to make such arguments, as I haven't seen all the evidence.
... Yeah, that's kinda my point. Doesn't that strike you as a little fucked up?
I agree with your desire for transparency. Let's see what comes out in the days to come. What I don't want to see is an innocent man going through an unjustified trial in order to appease a bunch of people, who don't know what happened, screaming for an indictment regardless of the evidence to support it. Do you believe that there was a conspiracy among them to acquit Wilson? You and I don't know any of the jurors or of any specific reason to believe they would be dishonest. Basically, you want to subject Wilson to a long, stressful trial against his rights as a citizen because you believe, without evidence, that the trial is called for. Give me a break. Where does the problem lie here?
