(November 28, 2014 at 2:47 am)DeistPaladin Wrote:(November 27, 2014 at 11:57 pm)Heywood Wrote: It maybe that the reason the evidence is stacked in the officers favor is because the officer was indeed justified in shooting Michael Brown.
Great! Bring it to trial and let the world see!
Why should we do that? Just because you are mad?
The point of the grand jury is to determine if it probably true that the officer committed a crime. The grand jury determined it was probably not true the officer committed the crime. Why should we bring the officer to trial if it probably not true he committed a crime? Just to appease your anger? I'm sorry but your sensibilities are not a good enough reason to prosecute someone.
