RE: If the universe was fine tuned for our life...
December 1, 2014 at 1:11 pm
(This post was last modified: December 1, 2014 at 1:13 pm by Angrboda.)
(December 1, 2014 at 12:23 pm)Heywood Wrote: I don't think a chameleon qualifies as a sub reality....but lets set that aside for now. For a chameleon to do something like this:
Requires perception, retention of knowledge and information, planning, and problem solving. It requires a minimum amount of intelligence. Can you give an example of a chameleon which doesn't have a nervous system or brain?
Like I said. You're expanding and contracting your definitions to include only what you want to include. That's the Texas sharpshooter fallacy. A chameleon animal doesn't intentionally design the subreality which is what you were originally arguing for. First it was designed, then the product of intellect, then reduced to merely having a brain. You're rubber band man.