RE: How is one orgins story considered better than another
December 3, 2014 at 4:00 pm
(This post was last modified: December 3, 2014 at 4:01 pm by Angrboda.)
I've studied science. I know that if I scratch beneath the surface, I find substance. I've studied 'creationism'. I know that if I scratch beneath the surface, I find bullshit.
I've seen that science builds computers, phones, and rocket ships. Creationism just builds piles and piles of treacherous words. The fruits are different.
Faith in science rests on faith in an ordered society, where certain groups do certain things. I can see that with my eyes. I can live it.
Faith in creationism rests in blindly believing the words of anonymous writers who wrote over 2,000 years ago. It doesn't compare.
I've seen that science builds computers, phones, and rocket ships. Creationism just builds piles and piles of treacherous words. The fruits are different.
Faith in science rests on faith in an ordered society, where certain groups do certain things. I can see that with my eyes. I can live it.
Faith in creationism rests in blindly believing the words of anonymous writers who wrote over 2,000 years ago. It doesn't compare.
![[Image: extraordinarywoo-sig.jpg]](https://i.postimg.cc/zf86M5L7/extraordinarywoo-sig.jpg)


