How is one orgins story considered better than another

[Esquilax]

But that's just it, they are not usally right. Honestly look at how many times the various theories have changed over the last couple hundred years.

Yeah, those are called "refinements," not incorrect hypotheses. Would you prefer that science didn't update itself continually with regards to new information, to most accurately represent reality? If the scientific community didn't do that you'd be bitching even louder.

Just admit the truth, Drich: you don't want science to be effective and so you're doing whatever you can to drag it down, regardless of the truth.