(November 30, 2014 at 5:09 pm)rasetsu Wrote: My previous thread on the appearance of design answers your entire argument. Your argument is a trivial result when properly understood. Either design is the product of intellect, which is the result of natural processes (evolution), and so is an example of sub-realities being created by a natural process, or it's not. Big whoop.
http://atheistforums.org/thread-24636.html
In that thread you claim:
Quote:The reason all X we've seen are Y, of human design, is because we've focused on an area rich in X that are Y.
I have already claimed(at least a couple of times already) that if you can show me an X that is not Y my argument is demolished. Its not that I am focusing on an area rich in X that are Y. I'm looking for all Xs....as many as I can find....and finding none that are not also Y.
