RE: Deism: I don't get it
December 4, 2014 at 10:52 am
(This post was last modified: December 4, 2014 at 10:54 am by robvalue.)
I see. Yeah, that kind of makes sense.
I make the same point a lot, someone is performing some ridiculous flawed logic and I just say that even if your conclusion is right it still doesn't lead to what you want it to. I'm trying to name the technique... "Betting on the wrong horse" or "shortcoming fallacy" or "pointless fallacy". Or something. "Dismissal by irrelevant conclusion", that is, your argument can be dismissed because it doesn't even prove your point.
I make the same point a lot, someone is performing some ridiculous flawed logic and I just say that even if your conclusion is right it still doesn't lead to what you want it to. I'm trying to name the technique... "Betting on the wrong horse" or "shortcoming fallacy" or "pointless fallacy". Or something. "Dismissal by irrelevant conclusion", that is, your argument can be dismissed because it doesn't even prove your point.
Feel free to send me a private message.
Please visit my website here! It's got lots of information about atheism/theism and support for new atheists.
Index of useful threads and discussions
Index of my best videos
Quickstart guide to the forum
Please visit my website here! It's got lots of information about atheism/theism and support for new atheists.
Index of useful threads and discussions
Index of my best videos
Quickstart guide to the forum