RE: Agnostic: a pointless term?
December 8, 2014 at 5:51 am
(This post was last modified: December 8, 2014 at 5:59 am by robvalue.)
Sure, I guess I didn't explain it too well, I'm actually saying agnostic and gnostic are rather useless. Everyone is really an agnostic by the stricter definitions, but mostly gnostic by sensible definitions. Anyone claiming to be a gnostic under a strict definition is generally being pig headed.
So instead of agnostic atheist, just atheist is fine. So my point is that adding agnostic is redundant if you're talking to sensible people with reasonable definitions. I don't think it adds anything that not being crazy wouldn't show.
So instead of agnostic atheist, just atheist is fine. So my point is that adding agnostic is redundant if you're talking to sensible people with reasonable definitions. I don't think it adds anything that not being crazy wouldn't show.
Feel free to send me a private message.
Please visit my website here! It's got lots of information about atheism/theism and support for new atheists.
Index of useful threads and discussions
Index of my best videos
Quickstart guide to the forum
Please visit my website here! It's got lots of information about atheism/theism and support for new atheists.
Index of useful threads and discussions
Index of my best videos
Quickstart guide to the forum