RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2)
December 16, 2014 at 4:20 am
(This post was last modified: December 16, 2014 at 4:27 am by robvalue.)
Watching an apologist make an argument is like watching someone pick up a deck of cards, shuffle it, and then show me the cards one by one. I'm then expected to be surprised or impressed by this.
If you don't have anything new, don't bother.
And anyhow, if you can logically demonstrate God to be real, then faith is no longer required. And faith is what you claim to be important.
No one believes in any of this because of the terrible arguments they present. They're lame, after-the-fact rationalizations of an irrational foregone conclusion. Which is why they are always dishonest and unconvincing.
Also, do you notice how apologists often employ exactly the same arguments but then come to different conclusions? (Yahweh or Allah for example.)
If you don't have anything new, don't bother.
And anyhow, if you can logically demonstrate God to be real, then faith is no longer required. And faith is what you claim to be important.
No one believes in any of this because of the terrible arguments they present. They're lame, after-the-fact rationalizations of an irrational foregone conclusion. Which is why they are always dishonest and unconvincing.
Also, do you notice how apologists often employ exactly the same arguments but then come to different conclusions? (Yahweh or Allah for example.)
Feel free to send me a private message.
Please visit my website here! It's got lots of information about atheism/theism and support for new atheists.
Index of useful threads and discussions
Index of my best videos
Quickstart guide to the forum
Please visit my website here! It's got lots of information about atheism/theism and support for new atheists.
Index of useful threads and discussions
Index of my best videos
Quickstart guide to the forum