RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2)
December 20, 2014 at 4:44 pm
(December 20, 2014 at 2:28 pm)His_Majesty Wrote: Still can't quite grasp the concept, can you?Nobody understand the Trinity. More honest Christian scholars will admit it's a puzzle that lies beyond human capabilities to understand.
Others will just parrot the line "one god in three separate persons" and pretend that this explains anything.
Quote:No one is saying that God and Jesus are "one being"....Jesus and the Father are two different beings, both of whom are the same GOD.I'm belaboring this point just for fun:
"Two different beings" and "are the same being" is a contradiction.
Quote:Just apply the title of "God" to both the Father and Son (and the Holy Spirit), and there you have it.So "God" is not a being but a title?
Atheist Forums Hall of Shame:
"The trinity can be equated to having your cake and eating it too."
... -Lucent, trying to defend the Trinity concept
"(Yahweh's) actions are good because (Yahweh) is the ultimate standard of goodness. That’s not begging the question"
... -Statler Waldorf, Christian apologist
"The trinity can be equated to having your cake and eating it too."
... -Lucent, trying to defend the Trinity concept
"(Yahweh's) actions are good because (Yahweh) is the ultimate standard of goodness. That’s not begging the question"
... -Statler Waldorf, Christian apologist