MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2)

[Esquilax]

My response was directly to the person who brought up Humprehys position in the first place; Minimalist.

Poisoning the well is something that is done pre-emptively, not after the fact. Since Minimalist brought up, and linked to, the Jesus Never Existed website first, then no accusation of poisoning the well is valid.

So then when you accused me of poisoning the well right after, it was your opinion that you were wrong to do so? Interesting.

Additionally, the best you could say is that you were both post- and pre-emptively poisoning the well, since the "anyone who disagrees with me just hates christianity and is not being intellectually honest," implication of your language both attempts to discredit Min, who spoke before you, and anyone who might happen to disagree with you on these points after the fact, which there's a pretty safe bet that those who disagreed with you before would continue to do, since you also didn't present any content that might change their minds, you just called them bigoted, irrational liars.

Don't pretend you weren't in the middle of a continuing conversation, there.