RE: On Unbelief III. Deconstructing Arguments From Design
December 24, 2014 at 5:16 pm
(This post was last modified: December 24, 2014 at 5:20 pm by Mudhammam.)
Well, I wouldn't necessarily argue that what we perceive as flaws would completely rule out the possibility that some intelligent agent had purposes for including them, or that the design is simply imperfect, though in many ways exceedingly complex and "brilliant."
My argument grants that there are signs of design and order, but not such that we can justly infer agency.
My argument grants that there are signs of design and order, but not such that we can justly infer agency.
He who loves God cannot endeavour that God should love him in return - Baruch Spinoza