RE: Trump needs to STFU!
January 6, 2015 at 4:26 am
(This post was last modified: January 6, 2015 at 4:31 am by Alex K.)
(January 5, 2015 at 5:40 pm)BlackMason Wrote: I agree that the scientific conclusion has INDUCTIVE strength. But let's not fuck around and pretend it has DEDUCTIVE strength.
Interesting. Can you elaborate on what this distinction means in our case here? I don't see how your use of these words adds anything except needlessly simplistic jargon to our understanding of the issue.
Quote:Oh and by the way your attempt to sound smart by mentioning double blind placebo is stupid. Placebos are for medicine and not raw science.
Haha, I'm aware of that. I don't need to try sounding smarter using fancy words, I was just snarkily exaggerating your position a bit to drive home my point that you make unreasonable demands towards climate science.
The fool hath said in his heart, There is a God. They are corrupt, they have done abominable works, there is none that doeth good.
Psalm 14, KJV revised edition
