RE: William Lane Craig continues to desperately defend the indefensible.
February 11, 2015 at 4:46 pm
(This post was last modified: February 11, 2015 at 4:52 pm by robvalue.)
The Kalam is one of the worst arguments on record.
Doesn't even indicate a sentient being.
Even if it did, doesn't indicate a god.
Even if it did, doesn't indicate any particular god.
Also, its premises are bullshit.
So all in all, 0/10.
That took me all of 30 seconds, what the fuck was he talking about for 2 hours and why was anyone listening?
Doesn't even indicate a sentient being.
Even if it did, doesn't indicate a god.
Even if it did, doesn't indicate any particular god.
Also, its premises are bullshit.
So all in all, 0/10.
That took me all of 30 seconds, what the fuck was he talking about for 2 hours and why was anyone listening?
Feel free to send me a private message.
Please visit my website here! It's got lots of information about atheism/theism and support for new atheists.
Index of useful threads and discussions
Index of my best videos
Quickstart guide to the forum
Please visit my website here! It's got lots of information about atheism/theism and support for new atheists.
Index of useful threads and discussions
Index of my best videos
Quickstart guide to the forum