(August 15, 2010 at 5:18 pm)Eilonnwy Wrote:No. It is a standard argument for atheism, I couldn't lay claim to it myself. It essentially points out the logical inconsistency of the concept of a moral god. Human morality is not discussed in it's premises nor conclusions. How can god both be the source of morality and be good, seeing as he is judging himself against his own standards.(August 15, 2010 at 2:53 pm)Captain Scarlet Wrote: If the statement god is good has any value, then morality must be independent of god. If morality is independent of god, then god is not the source of morality and therefore god as envisaged by Christianity does not exist. Therefore chrsitianity is false.How? This argument doesn't seem well thought out.
Are you trying to imply that humans give god the good attribute and therefore own their morality?
Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: December 22, 2024, 6:45 am
Thread Rating:
Meta-ethical argument for atheism
|
|
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|
Possibly Related Threads... | |||||
Thread | Author | Replies | Views | Last Post | |
A moral and ethical question for theists | dyresand | 131 | 22344 |
July 15, 2015 at 7:54 am Last Post: ignoramus |
|
Is a religion based on human sacrifice moral and ethical? | Greatest I am | 37 | 20851 |
January 16, 2012 at 4:57 pm Last Post: Zen Badger |
|
Argument for atheism from impossible actions | Captain Scarlet | 16 | 7878 |
September 1, 2010 at 11:59 pm Last Post: everythingafter |
Users browsing this thread: 2 Guest(s)