RE: Which religion would you sentence ISIS to join?
February 19, 2015 at 2:58 pm
(This post was last modified: February 19, 2015 at 3:08 pm by emilynghiem.)
(February 18, 2015 at 10:22 am)Losty Wrote: I chose Jehovah's Witness because it's seems like the best punishment for them.
I do second the Heaven's Gate comment, though.
(February 17, 2015 at 8:42 am)Lucanus Wrote: ^this
Also, two nice options would be Snake-Handling Jesus Freakism or Petrol-Drinking Jesus Freakism.
Oooh I should have read the whole thread before voting.
Yes, I agree on both
1. I believe the Muslims need to recognize Constitutional laws and maybe Buddhism as given by God to add to Christianity/Jewish/Muslim which they already recognize. But the Jihadists need a bit stronger dose of the nonviolence thing with FORCED unity that only JW can bring in Christ. If anyone can hold them to comply (or have them begging to be killed) it is those JW killing them with kindness, handouts and lectures.
2. As for groups I MOST regret leaving off the list:
A. Scientology (how did I MISS this one??? someone spank me)
B. Biblocality with Troy Brooks/Parture
the whole reason I found this forum, so of course, I must pay tribute
I would vote for JW keeping ISIS in its place. Any time out would be hanging with Parture and his trick questionnaire to get into his website. And only if you can get in, would you be allowed to get back out = torture!
(February 19, 2015 at 2:53 pm)FatAndFaithless Wrote:(February 19, 2015 at 2:52 pm)emilynghiem Wrote: I dunno CristW, the Democrats are already mandating health care as their own Shariah law that everyone must follow or be penalized as an infidel.
Wow. I thought the most ridiculous thing you've said was that homosexuality is a condition needing to be fixed, but that's pretty fuckin' out there.
Hi FatAndFaithless
That's because I DIDN'T say that and don't believe it at all.
Especially if you DON'T believe in discriminating between homosexual and heterosexual, you would treat them the same way.
So the same way some people born homosexual go through healing and come out homosexual -- some people born heterosexual go through healing to come out heterosexual.
one friend I met online went through healing and THEN came out transgender.
So why wouldn't I be supportive of both possibilities?
What if someone comes out bi or straight, or whatever,
after going through healing and accepting their true self.
FatFaithless are you insinuating I should only support my friends who come out gay? And the others, discriminate against them for coming out heterosexual? what?
What about Chirlane McCray wife of NY Mayor De Blasio.
Just because she identifies heterosexual now, am I supposed to deny her identity? Or deny that she identified lesbian before that?
Are you requiring me to CALL her a liar if she describes herself that way?
BTW I am a registered active Democrat, prochoice all the way.
So if people choose to come out as 'whatever' I support that 'whatever'
it is not for ME to decide for my own political agenda what someone
identifies as, it is my duty as a Constitutionalist to protect their beliefs and interests as I would defend my own, whatever beliefs they have.
Sorry to be so inclusive, i hope that doesn't scare or offend you.
