(August 23, 2010 at 2:21 am)LastPoet Wrote: Nogodaloud, you have yet to provide a serious argument, you are just running away with the goal post, and you are the one using intentionally dishonest arguments:
that is a common practice on atheist boards : trying to discredit the counterpart, accusing it to be dishonest. Let's see who is dishonest in this case.
Quote:1 - You deliberately post links of evangelical sites to provide evidence for your scientific claims, as if those could hold any credibility, They do not, except for deluded Christians. This proves that you are not interested in making any serious claim.
How do you KNOW christians are deluded ? you don't. Historical sciences are based on probabilities. You cannot KNOW how things in the past happened, therefore you cannot accuse someone, that does not share your opinion, to be deluded. Secondly, the stated webpages do present , what secular scientists said. Therefore, your argument looses completely ground.
And third, your answer just shows your bias and YOUR dishonesty.
Quote:2 - You practice the "Move the goal post" fallacy on every post, diverting any debate endlessly, disregarding the total and utter debunking of your arguments by several people. This further proves my point that you are not interested in a serious debate, but to rub your ego, trying to convince yourself that your delusions are true.
more baseless accusations.
Quote:3 - When people point out your baseless assertions, you simply ignore them and keep repeating yourself, as if in repeating enough times you could turn them true.
which baseless assertion exactly ?
Quote:4 - When using science, you cherry pick the facts of it that suit your argument, deliberately ignoring others that do not suit it so well. A good example of this is you talking about macro evolution.
thats exactly what it is. Darwinists should make a differenciation, when they talk evolution is a fact.
Quote:5 - You have done multiple times "quote mining" a very known creationist tactic and very dishonest one.
what exactly is dishonest about it ? you can do it as well, to make your point. No problem with me.
Quote:6 - When one calls you on your dishonesty, you cry you are being insulted when that is not the case.
Yes, you should STOP attacking ME. Attack my arguments, if they do not please you. And in the end, if you think, i am dishonest, you are saying, you deserve someone honest. then you should take your consequences, and search for other, honest theists, to debate with. Nobody obligates you to debate me.
Quote:This leads me to believe that you are nothing but a troll,
I see. Now starting with open personal insults. How about change your tactics ? Such tactics say more about YOU, than about me, and do not help your case at all.
I guess you stop attacking me personally, otherwise, i will stop answering you.
