RE: Freedom of speech anyone?
March 6, 2015 at 4:39 pm
(This post was last modified: March 6, 2015 at 4:42 pm by Regina.)
(March 6, 2015 at 4:02 pm)CapnAwesome Wrote: Right, I come from a Jewish background and I would fully defend the freedom of speech of holocaust deniers. Whether or not they are allowed to speak on the subject publicly doesn't do anything to change their point of view. These people still exist and in fact allowing them to speak publicly is a good way of identifying who the racists and holocaust deniers and Islamic radicals even are. If we force them to be in the closet it becomes that much harder. Also it gives a good platform for rational people with far better arguments to counter the absurdity and violence of Islamic idiocy. Banning speech just seems insecure and provides an alluring taboo for young people. They think 'Why would the government not want me to hear this?' Then when they listen to it privately rather than publicly they don't get the counter point of view. Where as in this video you have the host who can act shocked and call the guy an idiot.
This is such a good point, and puts how I feel into better words than I could probably word it.
"Freedom of speech" opens up the option for discussion. If used properly (meaning that everyone gets free speech) it always means people can come back with criticism when they hear things they don't agree with. It promotes debate, where "this is offensive, don't say it" just serves to keep the status quo going, which in this case is keeping religion privileged.
Where we can draw the line on free speech is when it comes to threatening language or incitement, but I think that goes without saying.
"Adulthood is like looking both ways before you cross the road, and then getting hit by an airplane" - sarcasm_only
"Ironically like the nativist far-Right, which despises multiculturalism, but benefits from its ideas of difference to scapegoat the other and to promote its own white identity politics; these postmodernists, leftists, feminists and liberals also use multiculturalism, to side with the oppressor, by demanding respect and tolerance for oppression characterised as 'difference', no matter how intolerable." - Maryam Namazie
"Ironically like the nativist far-Right, which despises multiculturalism, but benefits from its ideas of difference to scapegoat the other and to promote its own white identity politics; these postmodernists, leftists, feminists and liberals also use multiculturalism, to side with the oppressor, by demanding respect and tolerance for oppression characterised as 'difference', no matter how intolerable." - Maryam Namazie