(March 10, 2015 at 3:47 pm)Sionnach Wrote:(March 10, 2015 at 3:44 pm)Irrational Wrote: I'm not the one who ignored part of the whole sentence.
I didn't either. I simply cut it off for convenience. See:
The American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) found that the health benefits of newborn male circumcision outweigh the risks, but the benefits are not great enough to recommend universal newborn circumcision.
If I had unbolded your part, that would have been infringing on your post. I suppose you would have complained had I done it this way, too:
The American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) found that the health benefits of newborn male circumcision outweigh the risks, but the benefits are not great enough to recommend universal newborn circumcision.
And yet the key point you choose not to focus on is that it's not essential because the benefits are not great enough.
And circumcision having some benefits does NOT mean that there are no benefits to not being circumcised.