RE: Who are your favorite current Atheists?
March 17, 2015 at 11:09 am
(This post was last modified: March 17, 2015 at 11:31 am by abentwookie.)
(March 16, 2015 at 7:12 pm)Faith No More Wrote:(March 16, 2015 at 6:53 pm)Dystopia Wrote: Fascists despise social justice and they probably oppose 99% of the things atheism plus stands for except for the censorship part.
Atheism+ may talk like they want social justice, but they act more like their only concern is squashing dissent. Starting a movement that's supposed to be about equality while vehemently demonizing anyone that disagrees with you is just stupid.
Dissent? Why would you join a group if you don't share their values in the first place? That would be like me joining a Christian fundamentalist or Libertarian group even though I have nothing in common with either of them. That makes no sense.
Most of the prominent members involved with Atheism Plus definitely support social justice. However, I don't think they support people with opposing values joining the group just to stir up trouble, which was what was happening. This happens with any group. There are always those who will join just to try to tear it apart from within...
(March 17, 2015 at 10:47 am)JuliaL Wrote: ----- Me ------
Though I do find Matt Dillahunty the most coldly effective at putting down sloppy thinking by theists and philosophers.
He does the same to other atheists as well. lol Matt is the best debater in the atheist community in my opinion.
(March 17, 2015 at 1:06 am)WastedLife Wrote: Jerry DeWitt and Dan Barker. Both were preachers and left the fold.
Oops, I forgot Barker as well. I haven't seen much of DeWitt's work yet but I did see him on an episode of the Atheist Experience once.
(March 16, 2015 at 7:22 pm)Pandæmonium Wrote: Anyway, I want to apologise to the OP for derailing. If you want to start a thread on A+ (oh god no!) then feel free ^_^
Well, I may do that later but I would mostly like to discuss the idea of the involvement of atheists in social justice issues in general. Based on some of the posts I am seeing in this thread, I think it has the potential for a lengthy discussion.
(March 16, 2015 at 7:30 pm)Brakeman Wrote: I haven't read the others as much but Thunderfoot's posts I am quite familiar with. He doesn't attack feminists at all, he attacks their unsupported claims. There is a huge difference between the two, A really big, vast, enormous difference.
As for attacking muslims?? Uhmm care to tell us why we should be tolerant of weaponized superstitious drivel that incites people to perform the worst atrocities on a daily basis? I'd love to hear your special opinion on that..
What?

