Sins

[Norman Humann]

What else you got?

That you are factually incorrect on all grounds. I don't care what Jeebus says, you are conflating sexual orientation and sexual activity.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sexual_orientation

Sexual identity and sexual behavior are closely related to sexual orientation, but they are distinguished, with sexual identity referring to an individual's conception of themselves, behavior referring to actual sexual acts performed by the individual, and orientation referring to "fantasies, attachments and longings." Individuals may or may not express their sexual orientation in their behaviors.

And your assertion that anyone can choose their orientation is baseless andu incorrect, as well.

Efforts to change sexual orientation are unlikely to be successful and involve some risk of harm, contrary to the claims of SOCE practitioners and advocates.

You seem to base this mistake on yhe idea that thought is equivalent to action, which is bullshit. Once again, why don't we see inmates with life sentences for thinking about murder?

And in the context of thought crime, how do you view intrusive thoughts, which are very common? Thoughts that an individual has no control over?

Using logic on Drich is a bit like using breadcrumbs to tempt down a helicopter. Pointless and a waste of breadcrumbs.

I know, I know. But I can't help it. The SIWOTI is stronger than me.