To peace and love Christians

[robvalue]

Time to wheel out my hilarious stuff again:

Liberal: Claims their religion is sort-of true, and follows almost none of it.

Moderate: Claims their religion is totally true, and follows some of it.

Extremist: Claims their religion is totally true, and follows almost all of it.

Which one is the biggest hypocrite

I've lost interest for these differences. Right now I care only about people's actions and little about motives. As long as they don't break the law and are tolerant, they're ok. Personally I define moderate as being the same as liberal - But I wouldn't say they follow almost none of it - They certainly miss some verses but from my experience some Christians genuinely admit that they reject some bible parts. As long as they admit they're rejecting, I'm ok - It's always better than pretending it doesn't exist. I think the world would be better if all Christians accepted evolution, science and tolerance for non-Christians

I agree, I'm just being an unfunny pedant. All that really matters is how people act. If that means ignoring most of their book to make them a good person, I'm all for it. And sure, we need more of "the bible is metaphorical" type theists so they can actually learn about science without having mental seizures.

I just find the moderate position to be the most baffling.