Fish must be very holy

[Drich]

You gotta be trolling right now.

why because you have read the story for yourself and do not understand it?

So in your honest opinion, surviving with two animals of every species on Earth for forty days on a boat is entirely plausible,

actually there were upto 7 pairs of animals depending on their status with God. Read Genesis 7

but a goat surviving for the same amount of time on dry land that would have to be positioned only slightly higher than a fucking hill is impossible, because it wouldn't have anything to eat?

put any animal out in the rain 40 days and nights (where in that region temps can drop below freezing every night let alone a rainy one) and I would say yes it's chance at survival drops to 0 after a day or two.

Well, Drich, care to enlighten us as to what did the fucking people on the boat eat all that time?

Dragons, pixies, unicorns, and dinosaurs appearently...
Or if you want a biblical answer gen 6:21

Or if you want a "Spirit filled observation." The story of the ark is not about how man saved the planet from an angry God, but how God used the faith and works of one man's to justify saving and sustaining what this world needed to survive the flood.

Or where is the evidence for that huge flood?

its in the strata.
Most people assume this flood worked like any other. Water from point a washes to point b carring debris. It would be like taking a bucket of water and sand and dumping it on the ground casting what was contained in the bucket across a large area. However this flood did not occour that way. Water came from the ground up.
That would be more like filling your bucket with water and sand again, but instead of dumping it out, poking a small hole in the bottom and let it all drain out slowly.

This would result in The strata remaining intact for much of the world, just as it is now.

Or how did one man possibly gather two of every animal species on a boat without them killing him or one another?

again read the story. Gen 7 God brought the animals, all noah did was lead them on the boat.

Do you ever have any internally consistent thoughts, ever?

just because not all people think in the little boxes you find yourself in does not mean they are smaller than you.. If you were to maybe open up one of those boxes from time to time, you might find that you, your box and everything in it is and always has been wrong.
But, hey even if your wrong, you have pop culture supporting your beliefs. (the world is flat) [/quote]So what could possibly be wrong with that?

---

If you do not think this is th case and account for the displaced air. Where does it go?

The pressure would push the air further into the upper atmosphere where the gravity would not be sufficient to hold it back at those pressures and allow the air to dissipate into space. The air would not get denser, it would still be subject to gravity and when the waters receded ... oops, where is all our air we had? It will not come back.

So it is your expert opinion, increasing the world's circumference by 5 miles in basically all direction would have absolutly no Impact on the earth's gravity?
If so you need to userpt enstiens theory of relativity, and all the garbage about gravity being a product of the curvature of space time, and writer your own theory of relativity. (But if idk enstien was right it would explain how say a planet who's circumference increased 5 miles in all directions would create a greater gravity well in space time.)

Plus who is to say out atmosphere wasn't more dense pre flood? Maybe it was 15 psi rather than 14.7

---

I, of course, do not believe the Noah's ark thing or the worldwide flood, however, if it were so, the food would have been the extra clean animals that were brought on board. Two pairs each of the unclean and 7 pairs each of the clean are what was brought onboard. The extra 5 pairs of the clean animals would have taken care of the carnivores and omnivores (and god's traditional BBQ afterwards), but the herbivores seem to have no food on board.

The plants would have died out. There would be no trees or vegetation left. Even if they survived on the boat, how would they survive on the land? The land would be barren once the waters disappeared.

Oh, noes I didn't think of that!


Because everyone knows seeds from PLANTS all dissolve in water, and even more, wont grow in the wet ground!

Oh, wait I was thinking of cotton candy. That's what you must have been thinking about too.

Cotton candy dissolves in water and can grow in wet dirt. Yeah, cotton candy. You scarred me whew!