RE: Anyone got a comment for this..?
March 27, 2015 at 2:26 pm
(This post was last modified: March 27, 2015 at 2:28 pm by Huggy Bear.)
(March 27, 2015 at 2:18 pm)Esquilax Wrote:(March 27, 2015 at 2:10 pm)Huggy74 Wrote: The generalization is what makes it racist.....
The generalization had a very clear subject attribution that pointed to a group of people that are not a race. By definition, this makes it not racist, as the group under discussion was, in no way, a reference to your race, or anyone's, in fact.
Quote:To be clear, I didn't care that he made the comment, it's just odd that no one batted an eye, but my sig drew all kinds of ire.
Who is he talking about, in that post? What's the literal, directly referenced subject? "Simple people." Are you saying that simple people are a race? And that you belong to that race?
We didn't bat an eye because your accusations are entirely baseless and directly refuted by the quote itself, and your insistence that it is otherwise goes against the clarity of the language and speaks more to your desperate need to plump up your own sense of persecution and slander us, than anything actually racist.
Fist of all, he states "I think HE (referring to me) likes HIS Bling-Bling.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bling-bling
Quote:Bling (or bling-bling) is a slang term popularized in hip hop culture, referring to flashy, ostentatious, or elaborate jewelry and ornamented accessories that are carried, worn, or installed, such as cell phones or tooth caps.Obviously he assumes all black people wear a bunch of Jewlery.
Then he goes on the state....
It's quite common for simple people (Black people, since we already established what group hes referring to) to judge things on the basis of how shiny they are (probably a reference to monkeys). If it were up to them (black people) - all the financial transactions would be conducted using golden chains and rims (bling bling) for currency...