Anyone got a comment for this..?

[Ravenshire]

[quote='SnakeOilWarrior' pid='909272' dateline='1427495200']I'm pretty sure FateTits is a sock.

Nah. Just asking the hard questions.

We'll see. You're style seems very familiar though.

If you try to answer the question I've asked, you may come to new finding that change your stance on these things.

Truly, in what way should someone account for speech. How do we mete out punishment for speech?

And ultimately, why? If someone says something and some people take offense to it, where is the interaction that makes the speech worthy of punishment on the speaker?-

What is the nature of offense; Can something be offensive, or can something only be a thing that some people hold offense for?

Honestly, I don't much agree with prohibiting speech, even hateful speech, as long as it doesn't lead directly to harm (incitement to riot, falsely yelling "FIRE" in a crowded place, etc...). Of course, that's not what this thread is supposed to be about. Here we're discussing bigotry and specifically Indiana's enshrinement and protection of religiously based bigotry.