Objective evidence for the existence of Jesus Christ?

[robvalue]

It's an easy trap to give the bible more credit than just a random piece of shit crazy book. The idea that jesus existing is the "default position" if it's unclear is evidence for this bias. It's hard for me to take christians scholars seriously, because they already assume that not only the mundane but supernatural shit in it is true. That's not an objective stance methinks!

I think even non christian historians can fall for this, with the aura of power the bible has.

But yeah, what does HJ mean? If you set the bar low enough you can maybe drag his sorry corpse over it, but really it's not much of an achievement.

And I discount all opinions different to my own, to keep it simple.

But I don't know shit really so just ignore my fevered rantings!