RE: Argument for atheism from impossible actions
September 1, 2010 at 11:32 am
(This post was last modified: September 1, 2010 at 12:18 pm by Captain Scarlet.)
(September 1, 2010 at 1:56 am)fr0d0 Wrote: You're limiting God with science, which you don't have the knowledge to do. In your understanding of physics this is impossible because you don't know the link between temporal and non temporal. Assuming God assumes a creation from God. The theology is clearly asserting a link where you are not. The theology is consistent: it doesn't say that the two realms are disconnected as you are claiming, therefore your refutation is not addressing theology, but science.You need to show me the error of my ways and challenge the premises. I am simply using definitions of god and what we know of our universe to disprove ominpotence. If god is omnipotent he can do anything in our universe, if so he must have potential or knietic energy (by induction), but as he is immaterial he can't posess such attributes. Therefore he is not ominpotent. Which I would then assert disproves the god at least of philosophical theism and Christianity (although perhaps not a Posieden for example). I am not constraining a god with science in this argument. If I were I would say outright that he does not exist becuase there is the immaterial does not exist.
"I still say a church steeple with a lightning rod on top shows a lack of confidence"...Doug McLeod.