I think Cap'n that you're calling scientific explanation logic. Your only refutation of philosophy is via scientific understanding, which you agree we've established is not relevant.
What is this if not a confinement to scientific knowledge: "the supernatural realm cannot Logically contain the necessary type of energy to ensure omnipotence in the natural world"
I can't start to evoke physical theory without limiting the subject, which we've agreed is non physical.
So that's the reasoning to dismiss your original premise.
On to the philosophy. God is omnipotent and can and does interact in the physical reality from the non physical. From himself he created everything. Non physical to physical.
Philosophy says nothing at all to assist the physical understanding of anything. It's a different subject, and you commit a failure in logic if you try to understand one from the other.
What is this if not a confinement to scientific knowledge: "the supernatural realm cannot Logically contain the necessary type of energy to ensure omnipotence in the natural world"
I can't start to evoke physical theory without limiting the subject, which we've agreed is non physical.
So that's the reasoning to dismiss your original premise.
On to the philosophy. God is omnipotent and can and does interact in the physical reality from the non physical. From himself he created everything. Non physical to physical.
Philosophy says nothing at all to assist the physical understanding of anything. It's a different subject, and you commit a failure in logic if you try to understand one from the other.
