To those who believe Bible is not literal...

[tackattack]

---

I have few questions to you,

First of all where is in the bible said that we should not take its words literal? Or where did you get this authority?

Second, Why god sent something that much vague to people? Didn't he knew that people "might" misunderstood him for 2000 years (and counting for some)?


Third, why did he send it as figure of speech? We are capable of(and better at) understanding literal commands either. Wouldn't it be more effective? Did god likes mind games?


Fourth, what will happen to people (like me) who would get the wrong message?


Fifth, why does this illiteral stories such as noah's ark, book of job or story of lot constantly had to include blood and violence? Wouldn't that give the impression of "god loves violence and we should kill people for him?" I think bugs bunny style stories would be better...(Wabbits!)


Sixth, Is hell illiteral too? What will happen to innocent unbelievers? Are they going to be tortured enternally?


And the last, can you give reasonable answers to those questions above?

---

To answer the OP only
1- Romans 2:14-15. I take the figurative verses figuratively nad the literal literally. I use common sense, reason, logic, conscience and continul reflection to delineate between the 2.
2- He did, Moses destroyed them. Everythingsince has been man's interpretation some inspired by God some inspired by selfish desires.
3-See 2
4-If you dismiss revelations from God or deny the Holy spirit (or it's works in your life) then you are seperating yourself from God's will.
5-If taken literally yes I agree it would
6- yes to the first part. No to the eternal suffering. The Bible clearly states that God can destroy the soul in hell. Elsewhere it states that a soul will burn (thus being destroyed) in everlasting fire.
7- I think I did