(April 25, 2015 at 11:28 pm)Drew_2013 Wrote: You're right...that was a typo it was supposed to read
We have solid evidence a personal agent isn't directly responsible for lightening or hurricanes.
My bad...but you realized something was wrong.
So let me ask you this: in the absence of evidence against a personal agent directing lightning, but existing in the same world we do now, where everything else functions via knowable natural processes, is it rational to believe that in just this one circumstance, a personal agent must be responsible, just because we don't have evidence against it and may not know how it works?
"YOU take the hard look in the mirror. You are everything that is wrong with this world. The only thing important to you, is you." - ronedee
Want to see more of my writing? Check out my (safe for work!) site, Unprotected Sects!
Want to see more of my writing? Check out my (safe for work!) site, Unprotected Sects!