If I were an Atheist

[Iroscato]

I would consider 'evidence' for a creator as follows;
Something that could ONLY have been designed, and something that science has absolutely no explanation for. Now, the theist may at this point think "aha! Just like the universe, eh?!" To which I would reply -
"No. Don't be a backward cunt."

We have not yet discovered the cause for the existence of the universe. However, a creator should be the absolute last option that scientists go for. Every other possible avenue, every alternative, every opposing theory must be tried and tested to absolute failure first, before hands are thrown up in frustation and cries of 'godidit!' are heard in labs across the world. Science is a study of the natural law - therefore, why exactly shouldn't they try to find viable alternatives to the intellectually lazy explanations put forward by religion?

It seems to offend many theists that science has stripped away so much of their monopoly in the market. We have discovered geocentrism is bollocks, we've discovered that life on earth evolved and was not designed, but they still yammer and whine, clutching on to their ever-shrinking God of the gaps.