(April 30, 2015 at 8:41 am)Hatshepsut Wrote:(April 26, 2015 at 1:18 pm)Jörmungandr Wrote: An argument from incredulity doesn't become evidence by repeating it. You've made this argument several times now and it suffers the same basic flaws...
You'll have to pardon my brief side trip to the hospital which kept me from responding promptly. Of course I am aware that pitfalls exist when one rejects a hypothesis for lack of obvious mechanism. Or, if one accepts a hypothesis for lack of obvious alternatives. However, detectives do it all the time in the cop shop when criminals try to wiggle out....
Then again, I made no arguments of any kind in post #392. Nor did I repeat myself there. (A brief second glance at it should convince you #392 was actually a response to Drew_2013.) I think the "several times" you refer to occur only once:
That was a reply aimed at Drew_2013, not you.