RE: Black People - Stop Blaming Racism, Take Responsibility
May 9, 2015 at 12:23 pm
(This post was last modified: May 9, 2015 at 12:46 pm by Napoléon.)
(May 9, 2015 at 11:48 am)Parkers Tan Wrote: I don't agree with everything he says or does, by a long shot, but I think calling him racist over this is silly.
I didn't call him a racist. Pretty sure it was Min throwing around the labels of "Nazi piece of shit" before anyone else.
(May 9, 2015 at 11:48 am)Parkers Tan Wrote:(May 9, 2015 at 11:31 am)Napoléon Wrote: So you think it was absolutely necessary for him to use the word?
No. Where did you get that idea?
What is it with people's reading comprehension in this thread?
Here:
(May 9, 2015 at 2:51 am)Parkers Tan Wrote:(May 3, 2015 at 12:58 pm)Napoléon Wrote: I have to agree.
The context Min used that word in, it just wasn't necessary. And when you're accusing other people of being nazi's, it kind of undermines your own point when you use it.
I disagree. It reads to me that he's using it in the manner of speaking what he thinks A Theist's thoughts are:
...
Removed the unnecessary bollocks. Bolded "where I got that idea".
Quote:"Blindly"? I'm well aware of what I'm saying; there is nothing "blind" about it.
If you say so.
Quote:Again, where did I write that he "absolutely needed" to use that rhetorical device? Restrict yourself to what I've written and do not impute views to me I don't hold. This conversation will go much smoother.
See above dipshit.
Quote:Are you kidding? I've gone hammer-and-tongs at him before about what I think is his bigotry, namely, his anti-Muslim bigotry. Ask him.
Great, don't see how this has any bearing.
Quote:Again, I never said he needed to do that -- you're swatting at a straw-man.
But you did, again, see above.
I said it wasn't necessary for him to use the term.
You literally said "I disagree".
Quote:Dear god, trolling on the Internet? What's next?
Yes, because I was acting totally surprised here. Who's using straw men again?
Quote:Another way to put that is that "some of us understand how to read in context."
I don't agree with everything he says or does, by a long shot, but I think calling him racist over this is silly.
I understood the context. My point, on the previous page, still stands.
I'm not responding again PT. I'm not furthering the pissing match over this bullshit.