(May 18, 2015 at 10:49 pm)SnakeOilWarrior Wrote: Oh yay. Another former atheist come here to impress us with arguments we've seen a thousand times.
(May 15, 2015 at 3:31 pm)Freedom4me Wrote: I'm not saying that a theistic explanation is the only possible one. But theism does seem to accommodate a world view that encompasses more than just the natural world.Why must a world view encompass more than the natural world when there is precisely zero evidence(*) for anything beyond the natural?
(May 15, 2015 at 3:31 pm)Freedom4me Wrote: That was an important thing because I think that there is more to "reality" than just the physical stuff of nature.And, what evidence(*) leads you to believe there is anything beyond the natural?
*Evidence being that which is both testable and verifiable, and supports the claim you're trying to make.
What evidence leads me to believe there is anything beyond the physical stuff of nature? Well, although you will probably not accept my evidence as testable or verifiable, my evidence is moral absolutes, laws of nature, and laws of logic.
