RE: Nature's Laws
May 21, 2015 at 8:32 am
(This post was last modified: May 21, 2015 at 8:32 am by Tonus.)
(May 20, 2015 at 7:14 pm)YGninja Wrote: 2: Most atheists do believe there is no God, and this is evidenced wherever atheists are. Whenever atheists ridicule the concept of God, which is all the time, it belies their position that they actively believe there are none. What they say is another matter because they are just trying to have their cake and eat it: ridicule God without wearing a burden of proof.I believe that there are no gods. None. I believe this in the same way that I believe that there are no leprechauns, or tooth fairies, or loch ness monsters, and so on. Which is to say that I use the same approach that theists use for everything except god(s). Or more specifically, for everything including god(s) which aren't their specific god(s).
The whole issue of definitions and burden of proof would be moot if theists could ever produce even a single god, but so far the best we get is book after book of ancient urban legends, and moldy stains on a window that look like the virgin Mary. Which isn't much different from the evidence we have for the existence of fairies and bigfoot and other things that even theists dismiss out of hand.
"Well, evolution is a theory. It is also a fact. And facts and theories are different things, not rungs in a hierarchy of increasing certainty. Facts are the world's data. Theories are structures of ideas that explain and interpret facts. Facts don't go away when scientists debate rival theories to explain them. Einstein's theory of gravitation replaced Newton's in this century, but apples didn't suspend themselves in midair, pending the outcome. And humans evolved from ape- like ancestors whether they did so by Darwin's proposed mechanism or by some other yet to be discovered."
-Stephen Jay Gould
-Stephen Jay Gould