RE: Nature's Laws
May 22, 2015 at 6:07 pm
(This post was last modified: May 22, 2015 at 6:42 pm by Thumpalumpacus.)
(May 21, 2015 at 2:57 am)Freedom4me Wrote:(May 20, 2015 at 10:58 pm)ignoramus Wrote: Because the process of evolution doesn't require a god to exist.
Of course that doesn't mean anything.
It's the religios who are afraid that evolution proves them wrong with respect to "other" issues.
Go figure? They're a wacky bunch, aren't they!
This is the claim that atheists keep making. But evolution is just another story about creation. The thing that evolution and creation have in common besides the fact that they are both stories is that they both begin with a supernatural event. Creation starts with God creating, and evolution begins with raw inorganic matter self-organizing in direct contradiction of the second law of thermodynamics. Strictly speaking, neither story is scientific since there is apparently no way to falsify them.
This is factually incorrect. Evolutionary theory doesn't seek to explain the origin of life, but rather, it's diversity.
(May 21, 2015 at 1:19 pm)Freedom4me Wrote: I thought I made it perfectly clear that my baseball glove story was my attempt to explain my (fairly ignorant) understanding of the second law as it relates to abiogenesis, not how it relates to stuff that is already alive.
"Fairly" is not even close to being an apt adjective describing the paucity of your understanding of evolution.