I'm interested to see if any theist here has a sound and valid argument (An argument where the premises are true and the conclusion follows logically) for the existence of God, that is to say: An argument based on either 1) Evidence in indication of the proposition OR 2) Logical necessity for the truth of the proposition.
This does not induce standards like "personal experience", "emotions" or "intuition" as they can all lead to innumerable contradictory conclusion with no way to logically discern the truth of the resulting conclusions.
Also, an argument for a God is not an argument against a competing proposition, unless there is a true dichotomy.
Anyone want to have a shot at meeting these standards?
This does not induce standards like "personal experience", "emotions" or "intuition" as they can all lead to innumerable contradictory conclusion with no way to logically discern the truth of the resulting conclusions.
Also, an argument for a God is not an argument against a competing proposition, unless there is a true dichotomy.
Anyone want to have a shot at meeting these standards?
.