There is no way that you can prove the existence of God by empirical and or objective proofs, why? Because quite simply outside of the many so called holy texts the world over; we know nothing about God. The texts themselves are invalid in my opinion because they require faith in the texts without any evidence. And if we were to choose to believe in a text then there is the problem of determining which one is right.
Rayaan wrote: "We have to understand all of God's attributes before we try to form any statements about Him. However, that is not possible since this is something beyond our knowledge. "
I really hate to see this kind of thinking, that "knowledge of God is beyond our knowledge" as if are minds are so feeble that we must accept that the only way to know God is to submit to the assertions made about him in the holy text and to his will on faith alone. It is not arrogance that drives me to this conclusion but rather the necessity of proof. Any theist who makes such statements is simply dodging the question in my view and winding up his merry go round for what theists do best and that is circular reasoning.
Rayaan wrote: "We have to understand all of God's attributes before we try to form any statements about Him. However, that is not possible since this is something beyond our knowledge. "
I really hate to see this kind of thinking, that "knowledge of God is beyond our knowledge" as if are minds are so feeble that we must accept that the only way to know God is to submit to the assertions made about him in the holy text and to his will on faith alone. It is not arrogance that drives me to this conclusion but rather the necessity of proof. Any theist who makes such statements is simply dodging the question in my view and winding up his merry go round for what theists do best and that is circular reasoning.
There is nothing people will not maintain when they are slaves to superstition
http://chatpilot-godisamyth.blogspot.com/
http://chatpilot-godisamyth.blogspot.com/
