(May 26, 2015 at 2:27 pm)Heywood Wrote: What prompted this thread is in a previous thread I made the argument that homosexuality is not equivalent to heterosexuality. I made a rational argument for that position and the only refutation I could come up for it(since you guys all failed to refute it) is that perhaps God created them both to be equivalent.
You made a question begging mess of circularity, relying on a series of assumptions and naturalistic fallacies that you didn't even attempt to justify, and now apparently you're shifting the burden of proof by expecting that we all need to prove you wrong before you'll let it go. You don't get to lie here while I'm around.

Quote:Lets assume for a moment that egalitarianism is optimal human behavior. Why would it be optimal behavior? One answer and perhaps the best answer is because genders, ethnicity, and sexual orientations are all actually equivalent. If this is true it implies the existence of a God because an unconscious nature simply wouldn't care to create them as such.
Don't be idiotic. Gender, sexuality, and race are not entirely separate constructs that just so happened to shake out equal, they are slight variations on the same category, which is human beings. There is not significant difference in any of those categories that would prompt us to consider them as entirely different categories; look at a fucking biology textbook for a minute before you open your mouth about "unconscious nature," next time.

"YOU take the hard look in the mirror. You are everything that is wrong with this world. The only thing important to you, is you." - ronedee
Want to see more of my writing? Check out my (safe for work!) site, Unprotected Sects!
Want to see more of my writing? Check out my (safe for work!) site, Unprotected Sects!