Historian explains why Jesus ''mythers'' aren't taken seriously by most Historians

[TheMessiah]

Erm yes, that was blatant manipulation. Adding those adjectives was utterly irrelevant to the amount of evidence needed.

You seem to have ignored most of what I've said, I'm not a "mythicist". I'll leave you to your conclusions.

That was not ''manipulation'' - I'm illustrating that death via Cross was routinely handed out, that was, in itself, a horrible death. So I am asking of you, what evidence do you consider reliable for the Cruxification to have not happened?

I'm using that as an attempt to stress how insignifcant Jesus was - people expect masses of evidence for him, yet fail to realize that all he was, was a poor Jewish preacher who died a criminal death; the evidence needed to prove such a man lived is really minimal.