RE: Historian explains why Jesus ''mythers'' aren't taken seriously by most Historians
June 7, 2015 at 5:01 am
(This post was last modified: June 7, 2015 at 5:43 am by TheMessiah.)
(June 7, 2015 at 12:52 am)Brakeman Wrote:(June 6, 2015 at 11:12 am)TheMessiah Wrote: *Claps*
So convincing; you have now invalidated a historical consensus!
Consensus of people whose careers and funding come from university departments that would be disbanded when consensus that jesus was just a myth is met.
Woo Hoo! The bullshit is deep with this pretend atheist.
Wow, so apparently having a different view on History makes me a ''pretend Atheist!'' - better yet, by that logic, any Atheist which agrees with a historically accepted and proven view-point (considering Myther arguments have been destroyed for decadess) is now not a true Atheist!!!
You sound like an Atheist Plus nutjob who would say ''You don't believe in ___, you're not a true Atheist!'' --- this isn't an ''us vs them'' situation.
An Atheist is simply someone that does not believe in God. I do not believe in God nor do I entertain the supernatural.
P.S, discarding someone's arguments, or in fact, an entire group of people's arguments as ''they're getting paid to it, not valid'' is exactly what a religious nutjob would do, that is not a skeptical or rational viewpoint
Your argument has been just akin to a religious person who says ''God is real. Get over it'' --- you provided no counter claim because you have no argument. If the ''Jesus is a myth'' argument is so undoubtedly true, then provide proof and prove the historical consensus wrong; because you, an Atheist forum-poster on the internet, will have changed history forever.
