RE: Historian explains why Jesus ''mythers'' aren't taken seriously by most Historians
June 7, 2015 at 1:45 pm
(June 7, 2015 at 1:42 pm)TheMessiah Wrote:(June 7, 2015 at 1:40 pm)Kitan Wrote: I am uncertain why I should be concerned IF a historical figure named Jesus actually existed as a normal man. What does that have to do with worshipping him as the son of god, for either way, divine or merely human, he is unworthy of worship.
The historical consensus on Jesus is not debating whether he's worthy of worship - it's simply showing who he was, which was an obscure preacher in 1st century Judea.
I imagine that would be of more concern to theists, whose beliefs hinge on the divinity of Jesus, than atheists.
"Never trust a fox. Looks like a dog, behaves like a cat."
~ Erin Hunter
~ Erin Hunter