RE: Historian explains why Jesus ''mythers'' aren't taken seriously by most Historians
June 7, 2015 at 2:03 pm
(June 7, 2015 at 1:59 pm)Rhythm Wrote: -and yet you toe the line, and recite the script......like a boss! lol.
Just so we have some closure, you understand why your "no jesus, no history" argument is laughable to the point of irrelevancy, right? That this sort of statement, this sort of argumentation is -fundamentally incapable- of establishing what you wish to establish?
It's not so much an argument as it is a standard - the argument of ''No Jesus = No History'' is absurd - which is why I did not argue such, the standard however, of ''Evidence for Jesus needs to be a lot whereas other historical figures are not held to the same standard'' was the point; what you did was an oversimplification.
